Transavanguardia
New Subjectivity

by Achille Bonito Oliva
 
Castelo di Rivoli , TORINO, Museo d’Arte Contemporanea

The political elation of the Sixties drove art towards the impersonal. The creative force behind the image was invisible. Now, however, particularly in works by Chia, Clemente, Cucehi, De Maria and Paladino in Italy, the hand of the individual artist art is happily no longer divorced from the conceptual impulse. This hand shows itself in the capacity of the work of art to display a subjectivity that makes use of all the tools of expression and every kind of language.
 
The young Italian artists feel compelled however to use a means expression that is always subject to the rigorous rules of language. But language no longer follows the logic or the coherent, linear paths of recent years. Rather the new means of expression is rooted in an open, shifting nomadism that refuses to be trapped in predictable, logical development. The fundamental idea behind the new work is that of a drift, a movement with no predetermined directions, no points of departure and arrival, accompanied by a desire to find each time a provisional mooring in the gradual shifts of sensibility within the work.
 
Subjectivity asserts itself through its very fragmentation, through the accidental nature of an image which never claims to be a unitary or “cumulative” moment; it is always as a precarious vision, never grasping or attempting to grasp the meaning of the world and the accompanying idea of the infinite. Here, the image becomes the repository of a mere hint of potentiality, expressed through the means of art, i.e. grace and passion.
 
The works of the young Italian artists convey not so much private, autobiographical subjectivity, but rather the structural elements that characterize it: mutability, transience, contradiction and emphasis on detail. The new work is permeated by a sensibility that is energetic, not aggressive. This is associated with a notion of pleasure, and to the idea of a “guarantee” within art, that of successfully creating the minority reality of a personal image deriving from the artist’s individual impulse. Mutability derives from the transient character of style, which can never be guaranteed continuity or stability. The young Italian artists in fact use languages that are both different and differentiated, references to cultures both remote in time and also close to our own. A fan-like sensibility promotes images that surpass each other and move away from poetics and a traditional faithfulness to it. Obviously, the image oscillates between figurative and abstract, between reference to an excessive figuration and the balanced reticence of the abstract, decorative motif.
 
The transience is in the creation of the work, which is never hampered by academic perfectionism, but is always in transit between the creative drive and the stability of the result. Moreover, the image always catches fleeting sensations, such as the witticisms in the work of Chia, the sense of matter in that of Cucchi, the suspension of time in Clemente, the music of colour in De Maria, and multipurpose motifs in Paladino. Time as a relentless flow becomes the defining moment of works that contain the embryo of their own supersedence.
 
Contradiction arises from the refusal to be confined within the geometry of a coherence tied to a fixed, ideologically bunkered idea of the world. The images are the symptoms of an inexhaustible reserve that is not held in check by a univocal language. Ironic, dramatic images, bright, neutral signs continuously cross the surface of the work, never characterizing and defining things that are intended to be mobile and open.
 
Emphasis on is required to capture minute sensations and thoughts. These artists are opposed to the focus on the monumental and heroic that dominated the art of the Sixties. Detail is the anchor of the temporary, the support of an art that operates on the slope of sensibility and of the “state of grace”. The humble skill of technique also dictates an anti-heroic and ironically domestic behaviour. It is no coincidence that these artists constantly resort to drawing, which allows a refined and fleeting, dynamic and flowing expression. Drawing makes it possible to capture the rapid transitions of sensibility, its spread beyond the restrictions of matter and paint. The sign does not encounter obstacles, on the contrary it permits understated images that are agile and open. Drawing allows allusion without peremptoriness, it allows the expression of a state of mind without any need for a definitive and categorical description.
 
The drawing in the works by Chia, Clemente, Cucchi, De Maria and Paladino is sign, stroke, image, effigy, line, outline, scribble, doodle, landscape, map, diagram, profile, silhouette, sketch, illustration, figure, foreshortened figure, print, split, model, tracing, caricature, chiaroscuro, graffiti, engraving, map, lithography, pastel, etching, woodcut. The tools may be: charcoal, pencil, pen, brush, compass, set square, pantograph, slide-rule, ruler, stumping, stencil. The procedure can be arabesque, tracing, composing, copying, erasing, correcting, shining, drawing. The result: field, contour, shade, decoration, perspective, sketching.
 
Often in these artists the drawing produces intimate and emblematic signs, it works through shadow and delicate shading, perceiving a “second soul” in things, discerning elusive and unpredictable visions beneath the apparent vision of mundane things that are apparently closed and unequivocal. Furthermore, it tends to manifest itself as a trace of a wider, more concrete image, choosing to stay in a deliberate state of transience. The transience derives not only from the shadow or shading, but also from the very little space and time its execution requires.
 
The drawing always seems to reveal the artist’s assault on the immaculate space of the paper. Here, public and private coincide: the threshold of expression occurs even before any sign is implemented, it starts at the point of the mental processing of the image, in the movement and trembling of the hand on the paper.
 
Sandro Chia works through an array of styles, always underpinned by technical skill and by an idea of art that seeks its raison d’être within itself. These reasons consist of the pleasure of a painting freed at last from the tyranny of novelty, and relying instead on the artist’s ability to use various “means” of achieving the image. There are numerous references, everything from Chagall to Picasso, to Cezanne, to de Chirico, to Futurist, metaphysical, twentieth-century Carrà. But the recourse to style is immediately reabsorbed by the quality of the result, at the intersection between technical skill and “state of grace”.
 
Painting becomes the field within which manual dexterity and concept finally find a balance. In Chia, images always go hand in hand with a title, a caption or a little poem painted directly onto the canvas to reveal its internal mechanism. The pleasure of painting goes with the pleasure of wit, the ability to integrate the passion of the creation of the picture and the protective distance of irony.
 
The work becomes a moving circuit of internal and external references, all at the service of an image offering a dual quality: as substance bothpictorially and intellectually. In the first case the image is fulfilled by the materials of which it ismade up, and in the second, it presents itself as a stunning demonstration of an idea: an ideal of art only exists if embodied in the texture of language. Chia ‘s image is always crystal clear.
 
Franceseo Clemente works on the progressive displacement of the style, on the undifferentiated use of several techniques. The underlying idea is that of art that is in no way dramatic, and that can create an image where repetition and difference intersect thanks to the nomadism of lightness. Repetition stems from an intentional use of stereotypes, references and stylisations that allow the idea of conventionality to come into art too.
 
Such conventionality however is only apparent, as the reproduction of the image never happens in a mechanical or slavish way. On the contrary, it tends to create subtle and unpredictable variations, producing a shift in the reproduced image. This shift, and the idea of time suspended deriving from a state of relaxation, result in imperceptible differences. This is possible because Clemente works on the displacement of the signifier, on a chain of assonances, of visual analogies that free the image from all obligations and references.
 
All this creates a new contemplative state of the image, a sort of peace, removed from the clamour of its traditional references and given a different orientation one that is explicit and deceptively conventional.
 
The extreme explicitness tends to produce an image that does not display any effort or awkwardness vis-à-vis its surroundings. As if imbued with an oriental discipline, the new image does not betray any emotions, just a natural state of calm.
 
Enzo Cucchi radicalises painting practice, taking the picture as a means rather than an end. Painting becomes a process of accumulating various elements, figurative and abstract, explicit and allusive, and combining them seamlessly. Materials both within and outside the painting interact on the surface of the picture. Everything responds to a dynamic, unstoppable movement that drags painted shapes and colour lines beyond all laws of gravity. The painting is a provisional repository of energies that evoke images, densities of painting materials and ceramic extensions beyond the traditional canvas support. This type of work finds its roots in the fabric of a deliberately “minor” painting, tied to an anthropological and cultural territory that is exquisitely Italian. From the point of view of visual language, Cucchi’s paintings seem to be inspired by Scipione and Licini. The young artist’s use of colour as smudge is influenced by Scipione, while the dynamic sense of space and the freedom to place the figurative elements outside any naturalistic reference are reminiscent of Licini. The space of the painting or of the paper is not a background for the image, but an emanation and a source of energy in itself. The concept is that of an art that adheres to things while at the same time setting in motion a chain of mobile contacts and relationships to the extent of transfiguring them into signs of another position, that of a “dynamic landing”, where high and low coincide.
 
Nicola De Maria transcends the boundary between the frame of the painting and the surrounding space; his visual field is the meeting place of many references. Painting is a tool to represent the progressive shifting of sensibility. Mental state and psychological state fuse in an image that operates by the fragmentation of visual data. The result is a sort of interior architecture containing all the resonances and emotions embodied within the work.
 
Each fragment lives a system of fluid relationships; there are no privileged or central points. De Maria replaces the notion of space with that of a field, a dynamic and network of relationships rich in potential whose visual constant is abstraction. They share the same movement as music; there are no pauses, but an enveloping continuum of signs, an environmental painting incessantly referring to a single rhythm, a single beat, that of pure subjectivity.
 
The architecture of the work is flexible, each time supporting the space within which it sets itself. Concreteness and rarification alternate via the juxtaposition of painted wood elements marking out the environment, and compact areas of colour silently referring to indescribable states and metal conditions captured in the absolute.
Through the alternate use of geometric and organic signs, the language used is both the manifestation and internalisation of the artist’s sensitive state, and as an instrument of song and lyrical representation.
 
Mimmo Paladino’s work is surface painting. He is a proponent of surface as the only possible profundity. Thus all the most manifest data of sensibility emerge visibly, making cultural allusions and deep-seated inner references to the psychological condition. Painting becomes the place where subtle, intangible motives are translated into image. Signs from the abstract traditions, influenced by the works of Kandinsky and Klee, and more pompous signs in the figurative vein intertwine into a single, organic motif.
 
The different moods of sensibility are thus condensed and offer the possibility of free association. The rarification of each different mood, mental and material, finds its rightful place on the surface. Paladino is never autobiographical, as everything becomes a pretext for painting. The geometry of the sign is immediately disrupted by the myriad figurative elements integrating gently into the rest of the composition, without leaps of chromatic tone.
 
The idea underpinning the image is that of the fragment, of detail dilating and aggregating into another detail. The mood sustaining the composition and the overall state of the painting is fortified by references to languages derived from the history of art. The surface of the picture becomes the explicit threshold of the image, even when the latter seems to extend beyond the confines of the frame and the wall. Signs are ciphers that colour and decorate the skin of the painting.

Achille Bonito Oliva

 

 

Transavanguardia
Curated by Ida Gianelli


This exhibition presents major works by Italian artists of the Eighties whose painting and sculpture - under the rubric of “Transavanguardia” - became one of the most significant moments of neo-expressionism. The term Transavanguardia, coined by critic Achille Bonito Oliva, identifies the work of the Italian artists Sandro Chia, Francesco Clemente, Enzo Cucchi, Nicola De Maria e Mimmo Paladino, who first exhibited as a group in the late 1970s. The Transavanguardia, recognized immediately as one of the most significant movements of the Postmodern era, opposed the most radical artistic experimentalism of previous decades with a return to more traditional expressive practices, particularly painting. The term itself recognizes art that looks toward the past, with the intention of reviving, with a critical eye, certain languages already developed within the context of an Italian tradition and the historical avant-garde movements of the early 20th century. The movement achieved international recognition in 1980, with a traveling exhibition held at the Kunsthalle in Basel, the Folkwang Museum in Essen and the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam. In 1982 the artists in the group participated in Documenta 7, in Kassel. Within the span of only a few years, these five artists reached the heights of success, exhibiting both individually and as a group in the most important museums of contemporary art in Europe and the United States, from the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York, to the Louisiana Museum in Humlebaek and the Royal Academy in London. This exhibition at Castello di Rivoli examines the time span from 1979 to 1985. Eighty works, approximately fifteen for each artist, will be exhibited on the third floor of the Manica Lunga and in certain galleries of the Castello. The catalogue, edited by Ida Gianelli, will include essays by Achille Bonito Oliva, Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev and John Yau, as well as documentation related to the works in the exhibition and extensive appendices. This exhibition is organized as part of the Progetto per l’Arte Moderna e Contemporanea established by the Fondazione CRT Cassa di Risparmio di Torino, which has also made possible the acquisition of some works on exhibit for the permanent collection of the Museum.