Page 35 - The Documenta issue of World of Art magazine (2002)
P. 35

BeLA cziTROm
          TOpic                                     WAx scuLpTure
           by Andrea pagnes                         unique ediTion
                                                    cm. 36 x 27 x 18
           AndreA pAgnes is A freeLAnce
           criTic And ArTisT bAsed in veneziA       in. 14 x 10 x7
                                                    2002                                                      © 2002  digiTAL imAge   seLf-porTrAiT  zAkAReLy BLOj





           The Loss  of  Lyricism


               yricism, intended as a central position assumed by the   used to affirm a depressing and lamentable individuality, and this
               subject in reference to the world, cannot, categorically,   is an agony we are all guilty of having brought about. Art is art.
            Lbelong to our world. This does not mean that in the   poetry is poetry.  Writing is writing.  And this is all.
          works currently being produced there are no lyrical insinuations.    The origins of this agony can be found in the figure of
          however, they are uniquely due to the singularity of sporadic   contemporary man himself.  At the end of the 20th century, in
          intuitive sparks typical of an author, and not to a natural   order to survive (in the existential sense) his de-centrality in
          “ingenuous state”, a natural inspiration that characterises its   reference to reality, to the impossibility of affirming himself as a
          substantial uniqueness, its essence or its hypothetical creativity.    being in the world, man struts forth as a grand actor representing
          This no longer occurs.  Any work whatsoever, nowadays, even   himself, a manipulator of his own, and therefore others’, image,
          though it maintains a certain level of systematicity, always lacks   a hoaxer who loves (even though in the end he is forced to do
          organicity.  in the current context, man, and hence the artist, is   it) to continually represent himself within different scenarios.
          de-centred within a void, within flatness and the uniform nature   A chameleon, a manqué protagonist who has lost all trace of
          of existential chaos, ensnared within the demagogic viscosity of   behavioural innocence, even though he fully intends not to forego
          a phantom creative belief system. contemporary art desires to   an attempt to retrieve an improbable and indefinable naturalness
          retrieve and experiment.  by exasperating formal expression, it   of action and production: a standard-bearer, in other words, of
          seems to endlessly want to offer new possibilities, new openings.    constant contradiction. This is a behavioural trait that is obviously
          And yet the formal characteristics of a work only rarely coincide   induced and dictated by artificial needs.  but this is the historical
          with or clearly express contents in their entirety; more often than   condition of current man; this is his new nature, and these are the
          not (perhaps even despite the author’s own conscious wishes),   mechanisms of his cultural production.  not to accept this given
          they are mystified.  openings are therefore dilated to such an   would imply the onset of incalculable risks, not the least of which
          extent that they become a murky whirlpool where only fiction   is that of offering the current territories of society’s imaginary
          and simulation survive in any definite form.  form collapses, and   constructs, and therefore art, an other, a different territory.
          along with it the contents, as form is the substance that lies   perhaps this territory might appear to be purer, more just, but it
          hidden behind the qualities of content.  hence, totally devoid   is imaginary none the less. in art, which in any case has to remain
          of naturalness, art becomes and is an essentially voluntary,   faithful to its time if it is to maintain any sense, past meaning must
          gratuitous, hence vulgar, act.                         be made to resound, as the qualities of any work are determined
                                                                 more and more often by singular choices.  man stands on the
            *   **                                               verge of the 21st century as an extremely hyper-individual being;
                                                                 he is exasperated and continually wrong-footed by reality, by his
                                                                 artifice is none the less a serious and complex problem that offers
            contemporary thought is eclectic.  man is moving ever closer   own and others’ misleading, artificial appearance.  The problem of
          to a culture of becoming, and not of being.  Art, in general, thus   vast opportunity for replies and reactions. The only possibility
          becomes an evocation of other possible worlds, provided that it   of saving the naturalness of being and producing, as a means of
          does not have history at its complete disposal without having first   guaranteeing the survival of human quality, is to lead artifice to its
          run through its spatio-temporal context.  but nowadays this does   extreme consequences, and that is further, beyond…
          not happen.  now man is disappointed by art because he expects   This is an extremely difficult and complicated task precisely
          from it the realisation of something that is other-than-himself.  he   because it is paradoxical.  but art cannot, nor, above all, should it,
          expects new indications, while art can only manage to pile dust on   balk at this task, even though it is now abandoned and reserve-
          dust. The most tragic and painful aspect is that in this culture of   less in the process of disillusionment from which the concept of
          becoming man is ever more aware that he is a creature that can   the “poetic” arose in our century.  but an art that gives no illusion
          in no way go beyond itself.  faced with the rapid-fire mutations   or that is only reasonable – to indirectly cite Leopardi – is like a
          of objective evidence, he is destabilised and incapable of finding   reasonable beast: there is simply no such thing.
          his centre within the real.  The artist, the poet, incapable of taking   in order to communicate and rediscover the dimension of
          charge of the real that is incessantly eluding his grasp, substitutes   the sensitive, man has no choice but to go beyond himself,
          it with a universe of signs, colours and words that endlessly   further than himself.  communication, as dino formaggio has
          repeat the painful truth: “man is a creature that possesses no   it, is an act of the body; it is neither intellectual nor intellective.
          means with which to move beyond itself.  he is a prisoner of his   communication has nothing to do with information: it is an
          own making, incapable of fighting himself”.  This is an implacable   emotional reaction, it is communion.  Art that expels emotional
          repetition that, however, remains immutable before the void of   reaction only breeds fraud and deception.  sign, word and colour
          life; it continues to repeat itself precisely in order to find an escape   must be linked and organised together within the body.  The body
          route, a solution to dramatic, anxiety-ridden tension. yet in our era,   takes no prisoners, and when it gives in to deception, it confesses.
          people often become artists to satisfy a need for identity; art is   Always.


                                                                                                      WORLD of ART       33
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40