Page 62 - La Biennale di Venezia issue of World of Art Magazine
P. 62

CONTEMPORARY ARTIST IN                                                        JESSICA ALAZRAKI:
         LA BIENNALE DI VENEZIA ISSUE                                                  BALLOONS, 2019 OIL ON
                                                                                       CANVAS 60 X 48 IN.
         Today, to identify the concept of “unity” in art is almost
         impossible. Actually, the concept of unity has been progressively
         corrupted and broken down by a multiplicity of languages,
         codes, aspects and features completely detached from one
         each to other. Nowadays art seems to be only a synonymous
         of a market that imposes those artists committed to efficient
         organizations, prepared to invest money to promote and
         publicize their own productions, whichever they maybe, without
         really caring about the qualitative level or content they have. In
         such a situation, it doesn’t matter anymore if an artist is capable
         of substantiating his artworks with a high emotional/idealistic
         intensity.

         Those who consider themselves as artists are a confused messy
         multitude by now. Even if there is still someone among them
         who believes to preserve a pureness and a creative honesty,
         sooner or later must inevitably compromise and give into the
         art market rules to guarantee himself - at least - a minimum of
         surviving. More and more art has become a “job” incapable of
         communicating to mankind. It is just a mere business between
         dealers and collectors: this is sad, even if it seems inevitably
         necessary.

         We are facing the emptiness of contents and meanings:
         already known images and signs are constantly repeated and
         re-elaborated; copies increase; means of merely mechanical
         reproduction are often over spoiled; a real, proper exchange
         of ideas is practically extinguished. If art has always been
         considered a looking glass of its own times and society, it is
         now more than evident that today the obtained results are just   Incapable of really turning to society, art is continuously
         merely conventional.                                 determined by particular virtuosities or trivial banalities. It has
                                                              lost any form of sacredness and civil values, assuming features
         A crowd of “clone”-artists are often due - if not obliged - to   more and more individualistic and decorative. This is because
         follow what is up to date and what the art market requires,   “people continue not to ask what instead they really should”, as
         often without being aware that is just the market itself the   it was already said by Engels.
         pathos killer. The foolishness is that the intellectual and
         conceptual vision that has structured xx° century art, if from   The conciliation, the unitary ideals of synthesis of cultures that
         one side has brought to the affirmation that “everything can   the speeches upon art like untruly to purpose without ever
         be art and everybody can be artists”, from the other side has   knowing “how”, are now replaced by absurd differentiations
         pointed out that art is an “objective nothing”.      of genres and splitting of specializations.  Actually to affirm
                                                              the existence of an “international-plural-multicultural art” is
         Art no longer carries out the collective ideals as they have really   not sufficient to set expensive itinerant exhibitions around the
         disappeared from the Western culture. Nowadays, human beings   world or propagandize books, movies, records with hammering
         seem to be united only in one thing: the need - or worse - the   advertising campaigns: it is the inner message that must be
         hunger for money, giving - in this way - their contribution to   capable of involving everybody, more or less directly: instead,
         nourish the perverse tentacles of “Greed”. It seems paradoxal,   most of the times we are overwhelmed by gratuitous and
         but in such a reality, the artist “produces” only for himself, trying   superfluous artworks as well as by literary, visual and musical
         to carry out those individual and personal ideals that day by day   deliberate plundering. So, what will remain of all this mess?
         change, assuming different identities. In this way art runs a risk
         of being like the most vulgar of the mass-media (TV), useful only   Artworks nailed on some collector’s house walls, or stocked in
         for those who makes it.                              some dusty museum storage; yellowed, moldy books stacked


         62      WORLD of ART
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67