Page 207 - World of Art Contemporary Art magazine: The 2023 Guggenheim issue
P. 207

what happens in these domains. I personally have more   happened day by day helped me to collect experiences;
         experience and am better able to work out from classical   to be attentive to what happened, and then to use the
         material. In a way I think I have followed this principle.   same material in a more organic and more profound, or
         Obviously, I keep my eyes open; I am still very curious   more articulated and more critical way in my academic
         about all this. Really though, I don’t try at any cost to try   books.
         to understand and write about post-rap music. I am more   So, for me, it was a sort of mutual help: the academic
         able to make a good analysis of the Beatles, if not, of   activity helped me to have instruments to understand
         Johann Sebastian Bach. And that’s what happens with all   the actualities; the continual attention to day by day
         those new technologies. It is the same as what happens   events helped me to have material for reflection for my
         to a sportsman. You are a football player until the age of   academic work. The story of the novel is another one, but
         thirty. After 30 you become a coach.                 equally I don’t feel a split here either in my personality. I
         “Yes, exactly. But the coach of course has the       feel that what I do on the left side helps what I am doing
         responsibility of keeping himself oriented about what is   on the right side.
         going on...?                                         Different is the point of view of reception. Here there is
         Oh yes, keeping informed, but he is not obliged to try to   another problem: the fact that you are transformed into
         kick the ball every morning.                         an icon. They are asking you something that you do not
         “And also there’s this idea of being a facilitator, rather   want to give...
         than a user in a conventional way: one sees the      “Transformed into an icon: you mean in the sense of
         possibilities that are available, and makes them available
         for the other people and just says OK...?
         Yes, but it is younger people who must make the new
         analyses. They are more flexible and they are more
         independent of past experience. They do not risk
         repeating the same schemes; interpretative schemes. So
         why should I make analyses of programs when they are
         able to do it better?
         “Professor Eco, you are an academic; you’re a scholar.
         You also write popular books. You are writing, very
         successfully, for two entirely different audiences. Do
         you experience any difficulty withstanding tabloidisation
         of your work, where the tabloid media and the TV
         conform to certain genres and norms which may be     UMBERTO ECO, SEMIOTICIAN AND PHILOSOPHER IN CONVERSATION WITH
         uncharacteristic of scholarly work?”                 PETRU RUSSU, FINE ARTIST. PICTURE CREDIT: © MARTA DIMITRESCU
         The problem is triple. There is not a single problem, there
         are three problems. First, a statement: I write academic   becoming an oracle?”
         stuff. I write in the newspapers - call it tabloid or popular   Yes, an oracle. One is asked all the time, “What do you
         journalism. I write my novels that by a mysterious chance   think about...?”.
         have a mass success, but which I personally consider   Now, why should I think anything about that? This
         academic novels; and they are not easy novels. They are   happens not only to me. At this moment in time, Italian
         not love stories or things like that. So, there are three   journalism is such that every scholar every day receives
         different problems.                                  a phone call asking things like: “What do you think about
         Secondly, the problem can be considered from the     the marriage of princess so-and-so?”, or even incredibly
         point of view of the producer and the point of view of   stupid questions like “what do you think about the death
         the receiver. As a producer I do not feel I have a split   of Greta Garbo?”. Now why should you ask me about
         personality. All my life, the fact of studying something   this? You answer either with a triviality like, “Well yes,
         helped me to write more popular articles in order to   she was a great actress, and I was very shocked by that,”
         explain the phenomena of the mass-media.             or, if you want to be very original: “oh, I am very happy
         The fact of being obliged to do this made me make    that that lousy whore is dead - I hated her...” Obviously
         weekly reflections - I would say irresponsible reflections -   your answer cannot be anything other than some kind of
         cooked-and-eaten or wash-and-wear reflections on what   formality. So it is not only a personal experience of mine,



                                                                                                    WORLD of ART   205
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212